"Biggest fraud in the history of the capital markets"

Karl Denninger has been covering "Foreclosuregate" for some time now and it appears that his analysis has been spot on with regard to the consequences.

He makes a clear case for this with the following description of how the MBS creation process actually occurred:

No, what happened then (and still does today) is that these MBS are sold first and filled after!

That is, a pension fund calls up Vampire Squid Bank and says "I need $100 million of MBS that pay a 5% coupon."

Vampire Squid Bank takes the $100 million dollars and then proceeds to securitize loans.

But in doing so it took the $100 million on a prospective pooling and servicing agreement in which they agreed to provide loans of a certain credit quality and specification to the buyer.

So it's much worse than "we didn't know." It's "we took the money, then we build the security and didn't look, even though we told you we would."

biggest fraud

Capice?!! The Pension funds, or any other investor (Chinese, European.. etc) placed an order for a MBS structure paying a certain dividend. Then the Investment Bank (Goldman, Bears.. etc) packaged a bunch of mortgage notes together, got them rated by the Rating Agencies, then took that investment rating and obtained insurance from the Mortgage insurers (Ambac sym=ABK, Radian=RDN, PMI=PMI,) and others.

Ambac was the #2 mortgage insurer out there and it has been literally wiped out (put in "run-off" status) by this mortgage fraud. However, on the Sept 29th, they sued Bank of America=BAC for $16 Billion, alleging that 97% of some 6300 mortgages that Ambac analyzed violated origination standards (also known as Representations and Warranties). So, they and the other mortgage insurers (also known as Monolines) have had to pay the mortgage payments to the originators, which then gets paid to the security holders, leaving the banks off the hook for the swindle they perpetrated.

So.. the question is whether Denininger is correct and a Resolution Trust (RTC) structure is going to be required to finally resolve this mess and make those who were victimized (including the mortgage insurers and security holders) whole again. It strikes me that it will require this ultimately. But obviously the banks, and the politicians who receive their campaign donations, are trying to put this off as long as possible.

I have noticed that there is a lot of market activity in the Mortgage Insurer (Monoline) sector over recent days. I'm not sure if the perception is that these companies are finally going to receive their day in court. I definitely believe were victimized by the fraudulent ratings and "representations and warranties" that were presented to them when they insured these MBS entities. I will admit that back in 2008 I lost a lot of money betting on ABK, under this same premise, but that was at much higher stock prices. But I've always felt they had a solid case for denying payment of claims against these fraudulent MBS. The problem was that they needed a legal finding to justify doing so.

The fraud that was perpetrated on the Monolines is, IMO, like a person going to obtain vehicle insurance and lying about all the DUIs and Reckless Driving citations they've received. If you lied when you applied for your insurance, it's a clear cause for denial of claim should you get in an accident. You've lied in your personal "representations and warranties" related to your driving record.

Now supposedly the insurer is supposed to verify your driving record, but in the case of the Mortgage and MBS insurers, they heavily rely upon the Ratings Agencies (RAs) (Moody's, S&P, Fitch.. etc). Well.. the RAs were PAID by the investment banks (IBs), so they obviously didn't scrutinize these securities very closely.. Would have been bad for business if they didn't give the rating the IBs wanted. It was a very incestuous conflict of interest, which has been well covered in the news. But now one has taken the issue this far into the political arena, as we're currently seeing.

NOW, it would appear, that the issue is finally reaching a political head and Obama has "officially" vetoed that sneaky little notarization bill that the bankers wanted so much:

Obama's "pocket" veto with memorandum of disapproval

Obama knows this is a political hot potato. Banks don't vote.. They just pump money into the political system. And those who do vote have a lot of reasons to hate the banks at the moment, especially if they are getting foreclosed on. But they also hate the banks because they were forcing qualified home buyers to compete with sub-prime borrowers and even illegal aliens (it's true!!) to buy a home. Those unqualified borrowers resulted in a tremendous "false" demand that drove home prices up. So now, when the sub-primers default and the illegals bail out back to Mexico (or change their names) those who were qualified homebuyers find the prices on their homes plummeting back to earth.

Now.. I know.. no one forced them to buy that house. They could have continued to rent, as I have opted to do (but I just like my freedom to wander to another location.. ;0). But you know how much pressure husbands are under from their wives.. That damn "nesting instinct" that drives a woman to have a home of their own and few marriages survive defying it.

However, I've talked with a number of folks who have decided to undergo a "strategic default", bank their cash, and attempt to recover at some point in the future.

And as I saw on the Daily Show last night, even the Mortgage Banker's Association in Washington, DC has defaulted on their $79 million loan on their previous building (This is pretty damn funny, but probably not for those are undergoing a foreclosure):

MBA defaults on their offices

Good for the Goose.. Good for the Gander?

Really hard to have much sympathy for a Mortgage Banker when they can't even maintain the payments on their own "home".

Thus, if many Americans happen to have watched that, and start tuning into the Congressional hearings on Foreclosure and Mortgage Fraud next month, they may be even less inclined to continue making payments on a mortgage that is severely under water.

This is going to be interesting to watch.

My question is whether being an investor in the severely beaten down Monoline insurers is the sign of a potential recovery in the sector, or merely a short-term speculation. Some of these companies, if they can get out from under their obligations on these Fraudulent MBS insurance contracts, have a TON OF MONEY stashed away in reserve for paying claims. They could actually surge tremendously over the next year or two, if the courts see things their way, or the Government comes in and performs the "Mother of all RTC" programs.

Scrutinizer

Fed chief FINALLY tells it like it is

US on the brink of disaster


Bernanke Speech link

Edit 10 Oct, 2010

MERS has released a PR stating their side of the issue:

MERS PR

Here's more detail on exactly what the role MERS plays in the securitization and foreclosure process:

MERS

Scrutinizer

More on the MERS mortgage/foreclosure fraud

The following statement by a California Judge in this case sums up what has happened to most people's mortgages:

"Lenders passed around the deed to Vargas’ house as if it were a whiskey bottle at a frat party."

Here's the link from a year ago:

But Vargas, hero, citizen and family man, has been sucker-punched along with millions of other American homeowners, taxpayers and the nation’s entire economy by the mortgage-lending debacle.

A series of loans from some of America’s largest mortgage lenders cost him nearly $200,000 in less than two years and destroyed financial security it took a lifetime to build. Documents reviewed by msnbc.com show that loans sold to Vargas by mortgage brokers on behalf of the lenders were loaded with features that federal officials say are the hallmarks of predatory lending.

Lenders passed around the deed to Vargas’ house as if it were a whiskey bottle at a frat party. Ultimately, he wound up in foreclosure proceedings. And, finally, bankruptcy court.

Vargas’ story is the Cliff Notes version of what has happened to the larger American economy. It is a story of greed, lax lending standards, lack of government oversight and the fantasy that real estate prices will always rise.

Mortgage Deeds and Whiskey bottles

I also just read today that Ambac, previously the #2 provider of Mortgage insurance (PMI) has sued Bank Of America for $16 Billion:

ABK sues BAC for $16 billion over countrywide mortgage fraud

BAC bought out Countrywide and at that point assumed their liabilities. ABK is alledging that...

... 97 percent of 6,533 loans it reviewed across 12 securitizations sponsored by Countrywide didn’t conform to the lender’s underwriting guidelines, according to the complaint filed yesterday in New York state Supreme Court. Many of the loans were made to borrowers with limited or no ability to meet their payment obligations, Ambac said.

97%!!!!! of all the loans that ABK insured for BAC/Countrywide were violations of "warranties and representations".

It's evident that the financial crisis is not over. We have some SERIOUS PROBLEMS still remaining with the entire system that will likely take years to unravel (with, or without, congressional intervention).

Edit Oct 7th And it would appear that this congressional intervention has, in part, arrived. Much of the controversy over this foreclosure fraud was that documents were being presented with notarized signatures that were not accepted by other states. I also understand that some documents were electronically signed and notarized, which is contrary to the whole notary process (actually witnessing the signing of the documents). Well, Congress has QUICKLY passed the following bill and now Obama is sitting on it for signature. One has to wonder if he's wondering what the repercussions to his political career will be if he does:

n other words, with one simple signature Obama has the capacity to prevent tens of billions in damages to banks from legal fees, MBS deficiency claims, unwound sales, and to formally make what started this whole mess: Court Fraud perpetrated by banks, a legal act, and to finally trample over the constitution. Will Obama do it? Potentially - the banking lobby certainly has enough power over him and his superiors, the members of the FOMC. On the other hand, the populist revolt that will surely follow the enactment of such a law will certainly end any dreams of a second term, and potentially of a completed first one. The drama is now on: will Obama openly side on behalf of the bankers (without a "blame the republicans" fall back this time) or of the foreclosure "victims" (granted, the bulk of whom are deadbeat homeowners who should never have owned a home to begin with). We doubt a decision will be reached before the midterms, although quite a bit now hangs in the balance.

Obama's quandary

Yet, the market continues to climb on the back of a declining US dollar. The USD is down over 10% since May (input UUP, which is the "bullish dollar ETF" in the following link). But be sure to look at the weekly DOW chart first to make the comparison between it's performance and the UUP:

DOW Weekly Chart

Scrutinizer

Shades of 1937

Tell me this isn't downright SPOOKY!!

1937 compared to current market

The Prediction?

Scrutinizer